Player Dossier

2009-2012

Baylor

Lanear Sampson

WR • 5'11" • Mesquite, TX, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Lanear Sampson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

16.9

Efficiency

71.5

Consistency

55.2

Season Value

60.9

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Baylor

09101011111212

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Baylor
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Lanear Sampson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Baylor. Lanear Sampson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Lanear Sampson played WR for Baylor. Across 4 tracked seasons, Lanear Sampson recorded 1,905 receiving yards and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Baylor.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Baylor paired 646 primary output with 71.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 71.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Baylor

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

49.7

Efficiency

71.5

Usage

16.9

Consistency

55.2

Best Game by takeover score

UCLA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 7. SMU: 69. Unknown: 40. UL Monroe: 93. West Virginia: 109. TCU: 20. Texas: 70. Iowa State: 73. Kansas: 10. Oklahoma: 21. Kansas State: 20. Texas Tech: 91. Oklahoma State: 23

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 1 by 46.7. SMU: 5 by 92. Unknown: 5 by 53.3. UL Monroe: 9 by 68.9. West Virginia: 4 by 100. TCU: 2 by 66.7. Texas: 6 by 77.8. Iowa State: 7 by 69.5. Kansas: 1 by 66.7. Oklahoma: 2 by 70. Kansas State: 2 by 66.7. Texas Tech: 5 by 100. Oklahoma State: 3 by 51.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins44.7 · Games = 7 · -13.9 vs Losses
Losses58.6 · Games = 5 · +13.9 vs Wins
First Half58.3 · Games = 7 · +18.6 vs Second Half
Second Half39.7 · Games = 6 · -18.6 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

West Virginia

Best efficiency game

100 vs Texas Tech

Result
Fri 12/28@ UCLAW 49-26177707
Sat 12/1vs Oklahoma StateW 41-343237.77.7009
Sat 11/24@ Texas TechW 52-4559118.218.20132
Sun 11/18vs Kansas StateW 52-242201010013
Sat 11/10@ OklahomaL 34-4222110.510.50011
Sat 11/3vs KansasW 41-141101010010
Sat 10/27@ Iowa StateL 21-3577310.410.40138
Sun 10/21@ TexasL 50-5667011.711.70117
Sat 10/13vs TCUL 21-492201010011
Sat 9/29@ West Virginia100 receiving yardsL 63-70410927.327.30167
Sat 9/22@ UL MonroeHigh volumeW 47-4299310.310.30021
Sat 9/15vs Unknown54088010
Sun 9/2vs SMU2+ TDW 59-2456913.813.80236

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Baylor

    2009-2012

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2009201020102011201120122012
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2009 Regular SeasonBaylor29759.611.2
2010 PostseasonBaylor39061.113.293
2010 Regular SeasonBaylor39061.113.20
2011 PostseasonBaylor57274.914.1182
2011 Regular SeasonBaylor57274.914.10
2012 PostseasonBaylor64671.516.974
2012 Regular SeasonBaylor64671.516.90

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Missouri

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

85

Primary metric

85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

West Virginia

109

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Oklahoma State

82

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

82 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.

#4

Texas Tech

91

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Rice

56

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2012 Postseason · Baylor

646 primary output · 71.5 efficiency · 16.9 usage

60.9

#2

2012 Regular Season · Baylor

60.9

646 primary · 71.5 efficiency · 16.9 usage

#3

2011 Postseason · Baylor

58.7

572 primary · 74.9 efficiency · 14.1 usage

Milestones

1

100+ receiving yards

2

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2008 · Rating 0.8756

North Mesquite · Mesquite, TX

Committed To
Baylor
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2008

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

1,905

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.