Player Stats

Kenjon Barner College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
4,214
Rushing yards
3,623
Receiving yards
591
Touchdowns
50

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2009 PostseasonOregon13776413043.2
2009 Regular SeasonOregon1331930217443.2
2010 PostseasonOregon1140328042.5
2010 Regular SeasonOregon11632519113942.5
2011 PostseasonOregon12823052164.9
2011 Regular SeasonOregon121,0419091321364.9
2012 PostseasonOregon1316714324181.5
2012 Regular SeasonOregon131,8561,6242322281.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Oregon paired 2,023 primary output with 66.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 66.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: USC

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Oregon

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

155.6

Efficiency

66.4

Usage

32.9

Consistency

65.7

Best Game by takeover score

USC

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 167. Arkansas State: 74. Fresno State: 222. Tennessee Tech: 73. Arizona: 115. Washington State: 232. Washington: 122. Arizona State: 143. Colorado: 151. USC: 347. California: 100. Stanford: 79. Oregon State: 198

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 31 by 52.2. Arkansas State: 10 by 76.7. Fresno State: 37 by 61.9. Tennessee Tech: 15 by 47.7. Arizona: 22 by 48.7. Washington State: 23 by 92. Washington: 20 by 63.5. Arizona State: 16 by 87.2. Colorado: 11 by 100. USC: 40 by 86.1. California: 23 by 38.4. Stanford: 22 by 34.6. Oregon State: 28 by 73.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins162 · Games = 12 · +83 vs Losses
Losses79 · Games = 1 · -83 vs Wins