Usage Score
32.9
Player Dossier
2009-2012Oregon
Kenjon Barner
RB • 5'11" • Riverside, CA, USA
Workhorse runnerBig-play efficiency
Kenjon Barner leans workhorse runner traits and 66.4 efficiency.
Efficiency
66.4
Consistency
65.7
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Oregon
0909101011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Oregon
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: USC
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kenjon Barner, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Oregon. Kenjon Barner leans workhorse runner traits and 66.4 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Oregon paired 2,023 primary output with 66.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 66.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Oregon
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
155.6
Efficiency
66.4
Usage
32.9
Consistency
65.7
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 167. Arkansas State: 74. Fresno State: 222. Unknown: 73. Arizona: 115. Washington State: 232. Washington: 122. Arizona State: 143. Colorado: 151. USC: 347. California: 100. Stanford: 79. Oregon State: 198
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 31 by 52.2. Arkansas State: 10 by 76.7. Fresno State: 37 by 61.9. Unknown: 15 by 47.7. Arizona: 22 by 48.7. Washington State: 23 by 92. Washington: 20 by 63.5. Arizona State: 16 by 87.2. Colorado: 11 by 100. USC: 40 by 86.1. California: 23 by 38.4. Stanford: 22 by 34.6. Oregon State: 28 by 73.7
Split Comparison
Wins170.1 · n=11
First Half143.6 · n=7 · -26.1 vs Second Half
Second Half169.7 · n=6 · +26.1 vs First Half
All Games155.6 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
100 vs Colorado
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/4 | @ Kansas State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 35-17 | 30 | 143 | 4.80 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 5.4 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Oregon State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 48-24 | 28 | 198 | 7.10 | 2 | — | — | 7.1 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Stanford | L 14-17 | 21 | 66 | 3.10 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 3.6 |
| Sun 11/11 | @ California | W 59-17 | 20 | 65 | 3.30 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 4.3 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ USC100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 62-51 | 38 | 321 | 8.40 | 5 | 2 | 26 | 8.7 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Colorado100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 70-14 | 9 | 104 | 11.60 | 2 | 2 | 47 | 13.7 |
| Fri 10/19 | @ Arizona State100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 43-21 | 16 | 143 | 8.90 | 3 | — | — | 8.9 |
| Sun 10/7 | vs Washington100 rush yards | W 52-21 | 20 | 122 | 6.10 | 0 | — | — | 6.1 |
| Sun 9/30 | @ Washington State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 51-26 | 20 | 195 | 9.80 | 3 | 3 | 37 | 10.1 |
| Sun 9/23 | vs Arizona | W 49-0 | 20 | 86 | 4.30 | 0 | 2 | 29 | 5.2 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | 13 | 57 | 4.40 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 4.9 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Fresno State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 42-25 | 34 | 201 | 5.90 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 6 |
| Sun 9/2 | vs Arkansas State2+ TD | W 57-34 | 9 | 66 | 7.30 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7.4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092009201020102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Oregon | 396 | 63.5 | 9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oregon | 396 | 63.5 | 9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Oregon | 672 | 60.1 | 14 | 276 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Oregon | 672 | 60.1 | 14 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Oregon | 1,123 | 63.1 | 22.7 | 451 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Oregon | 1,123 | 63.1 | 22.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Oregon | 2,023 | 66.4 | 32.9 | 900 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Oregon | 2,023 | 66.4 | 32.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
USC
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
347
Primary metric
347 scrimmage yards and 51.3 usage.
#2
New Mexico
207
Primary metric
Win with 207 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
207 scrimmage yards and 22.2 usage.
#3
Ohio State
77
Primary metric
Loss with 77 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
77 scrimmage yards and 19 usage.
#4
Arizona State
182
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
182 scrimmage yards and 50.8 usage.
#5
Colorado
146
Primary metric
Win with 146 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
146 scrimmage yards and 19.6 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Oregon
2,023 primary output · 66.4 efficiency · 32.9 usage
66.2
#2
2012 Regular Season · Oregon
66.2
2,023 primary · 66.4 efficiency · 32.9 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Oregon
55.4
1,123 primary · 63.1 efficiency · 22.7 usage
Milestones
16
100+ rush yards
8
150+ scrimmage yards
13
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8744
Notre Dame · Riverside, CA
- Committed To
- Oregon
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
4,214
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.