Player Stats

Markell Jones College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,221
Rushing yards
2,594
Receiving yards
627
Touchdowns
22

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonPurdue121,1148752391178.5
2016 Regular SeasonPurdue11831616215466.2
2017 PostseasonPurdue1090864052
2017 Regular SeasonPurdue1053048050152
2018 PostseasonPurdue13583523053.3
2018 Regular SeasonPurdue1359850296653.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Purdue paired 1,114 primary output with 53.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 47.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Indiana

Win with 120 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Purdue

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

50.5

Efficiency

47.5

Usage

17

Consistency

58.1

Best Game by takeover score

Indiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 58. Northwestern: 32. Eastern Michigan: 116. Missouri: 32. Boston College: 40. Nebraska: 59. Illinois: 65. Ohio State: 12. Michigan State: -1. Iowa: 44. Minnesota: 35. Wisconsin: 44. Indiana: 120

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 13 by 40.5. Northwestern: 8 by 40.8. Eastern Michigan: 13 by 87.2. Missouri: 6 by 37.8. Boston College: 8 by 52.1. Nebraska: 14 by 43.9. Illinois: 8 by 83.9. Ohio State: 5 by 25. Michigan State: 3 by 0. Iowa: 15 by 30.1. Minnesota: 7 by 54.2. Wisconsin: 12 by 33.4. Indiana: 13 by 88.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins56.7 · Games = 6 · +11.5 vs Losses
Losses45.1 · Games = 7 · -11.5 vs Wins