Usage Score
22.5
Player Dossier
2008-2010Pittsburgh
Jonathan Baldwin
WR • 6'5" • Aliquippa, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jonathan Baldwin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.8
Consistency
65.7
Season Value
60.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Pittsburgh
0809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jonathan Baldwin, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Jonathan Baldwin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 1,111 primary output with 89.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
63.2
Efficiency
82.8
Usage
22.5
Consistency
65.7
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 12. Utah: 71. Unknown: 100. Miami: 26. Florida International: 14. Notre Dame: 111. Syracuse: 61. Rutgers: 139. Louisville: 24. UConn: 95. South Florida: 36. West Virginia: 76. Cincinnati: 57
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 1 by 80. Utah: 4 by 100. Unknown: 6 by 100. Miami: 3 by 57.8. Florida International: 2 by 46.7. Notre Dame: 9 by 82.2. Syracuse: 1 by 100. Rutgers: 5 by 100. Louisville: 3 by 53.3. UConn: 6 by 100. South Florida: 3 by 80. West Virginia: 5 by 100. Cincinnati: 5 by 76
Split Comparison
Wins49 · n=7 · -26.8 vs Losses
Losses75.8 · n=5 · +26.8 vs Wins
First Half56.4 · n=7 · -14.7 vs Second Half
Second Half71.2 · n=6 · +14.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/8 | @ Kentucky | W 27-10 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Cincinnati | W 28-10 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 25 |
| Fri 11/26 | vs West Virginia | L 10-35 | — | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ South Florida | W 17-10 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 11/12 | @ UConn | L 28-30 | — | 6 | 95 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Louisville | W 20-3 | — | 3 | 24 | 4.8 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Rutgers100 receiving yards | W 41-21 | — | 5 | 139 | 27.8 | 27.80 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Syracuse | W 45-14 | — | 1 | 61 | 61 | 61 | 0 | 61 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Notre Dame100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-23 | — | 9 | 111 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 56 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Florida International | W 44-17 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Thu 9/23 | vs Miami | L 3-31 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 6 | 100 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 1 | 56 |
| Fri 9/3 | @ Utah | L 24-27 | — | 4 | 71 | 14.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 44 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 404 | 86.7 | 12.2 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 1,111 | 89.4 | 26 | 707 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1,111 | 89.4 | 26 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 822 | 82.8 | 22.5 | -289 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 822 | 82.8 | 22.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127
Primary metric
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
142
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
144
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Cincinnati
113
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
139
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Pittsburgh
1,111 primary output · 89.4 efficiency · 26 usage
71
#2
2009 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
71
1,111 primary · 89.4 efficiency · 26 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Pittsburgh
60.6
822 primary · 82.8 efficiency · 22.5 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.9914
Aliquippa · Aliquippa, PA
- Committed To
- Pittsburgh
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,337
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.