Player Stats

Darrell Scott College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,561
Rushing yards
1,252
Receiving yards
309
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonColorado11448343105148.7
2009 Regular SeasonColorado51309535026.7
2010 Regular SeasonSouth Florida00000-
2011 Regular SeasonSouth Florida11983814169674.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season

South Florida paired 983 primary output with 54.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2011 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 54.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Colorado, South Florida.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida A&M

Win with 230 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2011 Regular Season · South Florida

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

89.4

Efficiency

54.5

Usage

26.4

Consistency

69.1

Best Game by takeover score

Florida A&M

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 33. Ball State: 93. Florida A&M: 230. UTEP: 90. Pittsburgh: 91. UConn: 62. Cincinnati: 36. Rutgers: 109. Miami: 77. Louisville: 64. West Virginia: 98

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 12 by 28.6. Ball State: 12 by 78.9. Florida A&M: 13 by 100. UTEP: 19 by 49.9. Pittsburgh: 14 by 66.7. UConn: 14 by 46.3. Cincinnati: 13 by 28. Rutgers: 20 by 55.6. Miami: 19 by 40.6. Louisville: 17 by 36.8. West Virginia: 15 by 68.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins111.5 · Games = 4 · +34.8 vs Losses
Losses76.7 · Games = 7 · -34.8 vs Wins