Usage Score
10
Player Dossier
2009-2012LSU
Tyler Edwards
TE • 6'4" • Monroe, LA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Tyler Edwards reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
66.7
Consistency
100
Season Value
66.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · LSU
09101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Edwards, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · LSU. Tyler Edwards reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
LSU paired 10 primary output with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · LSU
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
10
Efficiency
66.7
Usage
10
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/8 | @ Texas A&M | W 41-24 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | LSU | 10 | 66.7 | 10 | 10 |
| 2011 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | — | — | -10 |
| 2012 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10
Primary metric
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · LSU
10 primary output · 66.7 efficiency · 10 usage
66.9
#2
2009 Regular Season · LSU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · LSU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8983
Ouachita Parish · Monroe, LA
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
10
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 1 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.