Player Stats

Matt Scott College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
6,059
Passing yards
4,921
Rushing yards
1,138
Touchdowns
41

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonArizona627284188340.1
2009 PostseasonArizona92-24034.5
2009 Regular SeasonArizona9748443305134.5
2010 Regular SeasonArizona6911776135439
2011 Regular SeasonArizona00000-
2012 PostseasonArizona1240338221472.5
2012 Regular SeasonArizona123,7233,2384852972.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Arizona paired 4,126 primary output with 62.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 62.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: USC

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Arizona

Games

12

Primary Metric / G

343.8

Efficiency

62.7

Usage

22.1

Consistency

78.3

Best Game by takeover score

USC

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Nevada: 403. Toledo: 461. Oklahoma State: 375. South Carolina State: 349. Oregon: 219. Oregon State: 432. Stanford: 485. Washington: 299. USC: 469. UCLA: 128. Utah: 234. Arizona State: 272

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nevada: 53 by 61.3. Toledo: 60 by 69.9. Oklahoma State: 60 by 65.6. South Carolina State: 45 by 79.4. Oregon: 49 by 45.1. Oregon State: 58 by 66.2. Stanford: 74 by 54.7. Washington: 30 by 74. USC: 65 by 68.5. UCLA: 28 by 53.7. Utah: 40 by 62.7. Arizona State: 50 by 51.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins370 · Games = 7 · +62.8 vs Losses
Losses307.2 · Games = 5 · -62.8 vs Wins