Usage Score
31.5
Player Dossier
2008-2011Texas A&M
Cyrus Gray
RB • 5'10" • DeSoto, TX, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Cyrus Gray leans workhorse runner traits and 55 efficiency.
Efficiency
55
Consistency
72.3
Season Value
64.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Texas A&M
080909101011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cyrus Gray, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Cyrus Gray leans workhorse runner traits and 55 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 1,284 primary output with 55 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 55 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
116.7
Efficiency
55
Usage
31.5
Consistency
72.3
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 136. Idaho: 159. Oklahoma State: 44. Arkansas: 98. Texas Tech: 137. Baylor: 59. Iowa State: 160. Missouri: 104. Oklahoma: 62. Kansas State: 231. Kansas: 94
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 22 by 65. Idaho: 34 by 41.3. Oklahoma State: 16 by 28.3. Arkansas: 18 by 57.6. Texas Tech: 22 by 60.5. Baylor: 14 by 39.4. Iowa State: 24 by 65. Missouri: 22 by 42.4. Oklahoma: 15 by 37.4. Kansas State: 33 by 74.6. Kansas: 9 by 93.5
Split Comparison
Wins124.2 · n=6 · +16.4 vs Losses
Losses107.8 · n=5 · -16.4 vs Wins
First Half105.5 · n=6 · -24.7 vs Second Half
Second Half130.2 · n=5 · +24.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas State
Best efficiency game
93.5 vs Kansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | vs Kansas2+ TD | W 61-7 | 9 | 94 | 10.40 | 3 | — | — | 10.4 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Kansas State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 50-53 | 30 | 218 | 7.30 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 7 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Oklahoma | L 25-41 | 9 | 29 | 3.20 | 0 | 6 | 33 | 4.1 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Missouri | L 31-38 | 16 | 58 | 3.60 | 0 | 6 | 46 | 4.7 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Iowa State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 33-17 | 21 | 125 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 6.7 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Baylor | W 55-28 | 12 | 42 | 3.50 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 4.2 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Texas Tech100 rush yards | W 45-40 | 21 | 116 | 5.50 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 6.2 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Arkansas2+ TD | L 38-42 | 17 | 95 | 5.60 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Oklahoma State | L 29-30 | 13 | 35 | 2.70 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 2.8 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Idaho100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 37-7 | 29 | 101 | 3.50 | 2 | 5 | 58 | 4.7 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs SMU100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 46-14 | 21 | 132 | 6.30 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6.2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200820092009201020102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 423 | 49.1 | 13.7 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Texas A&M | 983 | 46.8 | 21.7 | 560 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 983 | 46.8 | 21.7 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Texas A&M | 1,384 | 53.8 | 30 | 401 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1,384 | 53.8 | 30 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1,284 | 55 | 31.5 | -100 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
227
Primary metric
227 scrimmage yards and 56 usage.
#2
Kansas State
231
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
231 scrimmage yards and 47.8 usage.
#3
Nebraska
202
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
202 scrimmage yards and 60.3 usage.
#4
Colorado
80
Primary metric
Win with 80 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
80 scrimmage yards and 23.4 usage.
#5
Texas Tech
172
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
172 scrimmage yards and 38.2 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Texas A&M
1,284 primary output · 55 efficiency · 31.5 usage
64.4
#2
2010 Postseason · Texas A&M
63.3
1,384 primary · 53.8 efficiency · 30 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Texas A&M
63.3
1,384 primary · 53.8 efficiency · 30 usage
Milestones
19
100+ rush yards
7
150+ scrimmage yards
9
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.9668
DeSoto · DeSoto, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
4,074
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.