Usage Score
21.3
Player Dossier
2008-2011Texas A&M
Jeff Fuller
WR • 6'4" • McKinney, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jeff Fuller reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.5
Consistency
70.4
Season Value
63.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Texas A&M
08090910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeff Fuller, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Texas A&M. Jeff Fuller reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 1,066 primary output with 84.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
63.7
Efficiency
78.5
Usage
21.3
Consistency
70.4
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 119. SMU: 52. Idaho: 79. Oklahoma State: 55. Arkansas: 82. Texas Tech: 12. Baylor: 71. Iowa State: 75. Missouri: 42. Oklahoma: 54. Kansas State: 47. Kansas: 33. Texas: 107
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 7 by 100. SMU: 6 by 57.8. Idaho: 5 by 100. Oklahoma State: 6 by 61.1. Arkansas: 9 by 60.7. Texas Tech: 1 by 80. Baylor: 5 by 94.7. Iowa State: 7 by 71.4. Missouri: 5 by 56. Oklahoma: 6 by 60. Kansas State: 4 by 78.3. Kansas: 2 by 100. Texas: 7 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins63 · n=7 · -1.5 vs Losses
Losses64.5 · n=6 · +1.5 vs Wins
First Half67.1 · n=7 · +7.5 vs Second Half
Second Half59.7 · n=6 · -7.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Northwestern100 receiving yards | W 33-22 | — | 7 | 119 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 38 |
| Fri 11/25 | vs Texas100 receiving yards | L 25-27 | — | 7 | 107 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Kansas | W 61-7 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Kansas State | L 50-53 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Oklahoma | L 25-41 | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Missouri | L 31-38 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Iowa State | W 33-17 | — | 7 | 75 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Baylor | W 55-28 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Texas Tech | W 45-40 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ ArkansasHigh volume | L 38-42 | — | 9 | 82 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Oklahoma State2+ TD | L 29-30 | — | 6 | 55 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 2 | 17 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Idaho | W 37-7 | — | 5 | 79 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs SMU | W 46-14 | — | 6 | 52 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 630 | 76.2 | 21.7 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Texas A&M | 568 | 84.4 | 19.3 | -62 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 568 | 84.4 | 19.3 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Texas A&M | 1,066 | 84.3 | 24.3 | 498 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1,066 | 84.3 | 24.3 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Texas A&M | 828 | 78.5 | 21.3 | -238 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 828 | 78.5 | 21.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
154
Primary metric
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado
95
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
160
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas Tech
171
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
171 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Northwestern
119
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Texas A&M
1,066 primary output · 84.3 efficiency · 24.3 usage
66.9
#2
2010 Regular Season · Texas A&M
66.9
1,066 primary · 84.3 efficiency · 24.3 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Texas A&M
63.3
828 primary · 78.5 efficiency · 21.3 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
8
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.9428
Boyd · McKinney, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,092
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.