Player Stats

Brendon Kay College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
5,150
Passing yards
4,647
Rushing yards
503
Touchdowns
41

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonCincinnati2512724039.5
2010 Regular SeasonCincinnati1342014044.5
2011 Regular SeasonCincinnati122022046.9
2012 PostseasonCincinnati1140833276445.4
2012 Regular SeasonCincinnati111,196966230945.4
2013 PostseasonCincinnati13166181-15068
2013 Regular SeasonCincinnati133,2733,1211522868

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

Cincinnati paired 3,439 primary output with 63.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 63.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Houston

Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · Cincinnati

Games

13

Primary Metric / G

264.5

Efficiency

63.4

Usage

14.7

Consistency

76

Best Game by takeover score

Houston

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 166. Purdue: 61. Illinois: 74. Northwestern State: 284. Miami (OH): 201. South Florida: 268. Temple: 288. UConn: 302. Memphis: 321. SMU: 291. Rutgers: 412. Houston: 444. Louisville: 327

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 43 by 43.6. Purdue: 6 by 74.6. Illinois: 14 by 54.6. Northwestern State: 17 by 82.9. Miami (OH): 44 by 55.5. South Florida: 47 by 56.4. Temple: 43 by 68.6. UConn: 26 by 70.2. Memphis: 40 by 60.5. SMU: 38 by 59.3. Rutgers: 39 by 80.5. Houston: 59 by 63. Louisville: 51 by 54.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins289.3 · Games = 9 · +80.6 vs Losses
Losses208.8 · Games = 4 · -80.6 vs Wins