Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Ohio State paired 193 primary output with 75.5 efficiency.
Player Stats
Jake Stoneburner College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 714
- Receptions
- 53
- Touchdowns
- 13
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio State | 2 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 54.8 |
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio State | 9 | 3 | 39 | 0 | 61.6 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio State | 9 | 18 | 183 | 2 | 61.6 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio State | 7 | 14 | 193 | 7 | 77.2 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio State | 8 | 16 | 269 | 4 | 72.2 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Ohio State
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
33.6
Efficiency
85.8
Usage
14.9
Consistency
53.3
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 28. UCF: 20. California: 44. Indiana: 41. Purdue: 17. Penn State: 86. Illinois: 24. Michigan: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 2 by 93.3. UCF: 2 by 66.7. California: 3 by 97.8. Indiana: 4 by 68.3. Purdue: 1 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 100. Illinois: 1 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
First Half33.3 · Games = 4 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half34 · Games = 4 · +0.8 vs First Half
Next best actions
Keep exploring Jake Stoneburner
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.