Usage / Role
8%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2012Ohio State
TE • 6'5" • Dublin, OH, USA
Jake Stoneburner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
8%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
43
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
38
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
59
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Ohio State
Snapshot
Player Story
Jake Stoneburner built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a tight end from Dublin, OH wearing No. 11, spending time with Ohio State. The clearest part of Jake Stoneburner's career was his receiving role: 53...
Read the storyJake Stoneburner, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Ohio State. Jake Stoneburner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio State | 2 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 54.8 |
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio State | 9 | 3 | 39 | 0 | 61.6 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio State | 9 | 18 | 183 | 2 | 61.6 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio State | 7 | 14 | 193 | 7 | 77.2 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio State | 8 | 16 | 269 | 4 | 72.2 |
Related Context
Jake Stoneburner played TE for Ohio State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jake Stoneburner recorded 714 receiving yards and 13 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Ohio State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Ohio State paired 193 primary output with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
33.6
Efficiency
85.8
Usage
14.9
Consistency
53.3
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 28. UCF: 20. California: 44. Indiana: 41. Purdue: 17. Penn State: 86. Illinois: 24. Michigan: 9
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 2 by 93.3. UCF: 2 by 66.7. California: 3 by 97.8. Indiana: 4 by 68.3. Purdue: 1 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 100. Illinois: 1 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 60
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | vs Michigan | W 26-21 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Illinois | W 52-22 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Penn State | W 35-23 | — | 2 | 86 | 43 | 43 | 1 | 72 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Purdue | W 29-22 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/14 | @ Indiana | W 52-49 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs California2+ TD | W 35-28 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs UCF | W 31-16 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Miami (OH) | W 56-10 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 20 |
Player Story
Jake Stoneburner built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a tight end from Dublin, OH wearing No. 11, spending time with Ohio State. The clearest part of Jake Stoneburner's career was his receiving role: 53 catches, 714 receiving yards, and 13 touchdowns across 26 career games in the available record. That gives Jake Stoneburner's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio State
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Ohio State | 30 | 93.4 | 5.8 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Ohio State | 222 | 59.6 | 13.5 | 192 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ohio State | 222 | 59.6 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ohio State | 193 | 75.5 | 28.5 | -29 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ohio State | 269 | 85.8 | 14.9 | 76 |
#1 Featured game
@ Penn State
Week 9 · W 35-23 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86
Receiving Yards
98.4 takeover
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Akron
Week 1 · W 42-0
50
Receiving Yards
83.3 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#3
vs Ohio
Week 3 · W 43-7
61
Receiving Yards
81.8 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 81.3 efficiency score.
#4
vs Toledo
Week 2 · W 27-22
43
Receiving Yards
80.3 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 71.7 efficiency score.
#5
@ Illinois
Week 7 · W 17-7 · Conference game
17
Receiving Yards
78 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Ohio State
193 primary output · 75.5 efficiency · 28.5 usage
77.2
#2
2012 Regular Season · Ohio State
72.2
269 primary · 85.8 efficiency · 14.9 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Ohio State
61.6
222 primary · 59.6 efficiency · 13.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.