Usage Score
10.7
Player Dossier
2009-2010Clemson
Kyle Parker
QB • 6'1" • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Kyle Parker is a balanced quarterback profile with 10.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
57.2
Consistency
86.8
Season Value
60.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Clemson
09091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyle Parker, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Clemson. Kyle Parker is a balanced quarterback profile with 10.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Clemson paired 2,661 primary output with 58.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 57.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Clemson
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
172.4
Efficiency
57.2
Usage
10.7
Consistency
86.8
Best Game by takeover score
South Florida
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Florida: 142. North Texas: 169. Unknown: 92. Auburn: 218. Miami: 148. North Carolina: 223. Maryland: 144. Georgia Tech: 173. Boston College: 198. NC State: 193. Florida State: 245. Wake Forest: 179. South Carolina: 117
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Florida: 19 by 61.7. North Texas: 18 by 53.1. Unknown: 10 by 66.7. Auburn: 38 by 53.2. Miami: 37 by 35.9. North Carolina: 42 by 56.2. Maryland: 32 by 52.7. Georgia Tech: 29 by 61.1. Boston College: 41 by 67.7. NC State: 36 by 54.2. Florida State: 48 by 51.4. Wake Forest: 21 by 70.8. South Carolina: 17 by 58.3
Split Comparison
Wins171.6 · n=5 · -12.8 vs Losses
Losses184.4 · n=7 · +12.8 vs Wins
First Half162.3 · n=7 · -21.9 vs Second Half
Second Half184.2 · n=6 · +21.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Florida State
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Wake Forest
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | vs South Florida | L 26-31 | 11 | 17 | 134 | 64.7 | 0 | 1 | 61.7 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 11/28 | vs South Carolina | L 7-29 | 7 | 17 | 117 | 41.2 | 1 | 1 | 58.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Wake Forest | W 30-10 | 15 | 17 | 194 | 88.2 | 2 | 0 | 70.8 | 4 | -15 | -3.80 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Florida State | L 13-16 | 28 | 44 | 239 | 63.6 | 0 | 2 | 51.4 | 4 | 6 | 1.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs NC State | W 14-13 | 20 | 29 | 214 | 69.0 | 1 | 1 | 54.2 | 7 | -21 | -3 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Boston College | L 10-16 | 21 | 39 | 176 | 53.8 | 0 | 2 | 67.7 | 2 | 22 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Georgia Tech | W 27-13 | 17 | 27 | 167 | 63.0 | 1 | 0 | 61.1 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Maryland | W 31-7 | 7 | 20 | 106 | 35.0 | 0 | 0 | 52.7 | 12 | 38 | 3.20 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ North Carolina | L 16-21 | 21 | 38 | 214 | 55.3 | 1 | 0 | 56.2 | 4 | 9 | 2.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Miami | L 21-30 | 14 | 33 | 149 | 42.4 | 0 | 3 | 35.9 | 4 | -1 | -0.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Auburn | L 24-27 | 20 | 34 | 220 | 58.8 | 2 | 0 | 53.2 | 4 | -2 | -0.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 9 | 114 | 66.7 | 2 | 0 | 66.7 | 1 | -22 | -22 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs North Texas | W 35-10 | 9 | 17 | 169 | 52.9 | 2 | 1 | 53.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Clemson | 2,661 | 58.7 | 13 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Clemson | 2,661 | 58.7 | 13 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Clemson | 2,241 | 57.2 | 10.7 | -420 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Clemson | 2,241 | 57.2 | 10.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Virginia
Win with 254 yards of offense and 72 efficiency.
254
Primary metric
254 total offense with 72 efficiency.
#2
Miami
284
Primary metric
Win with 284 yards of offense and 57.5 efficiency.
284 total offense with 57.5 efficiency.
#3
Florida State
264
Primary metric
Win with 264 yards of offense and 67.2 efficiency.
264 total offense with 67.2 efficiency.
#4
Florida State
245
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
245 total offense with 51.4 efficiency.
#5
Georgia Tech
265
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
265 total offense with 49.6 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Clemson
2,661 primary output · 58.7 efficiency · 13 usage
63.5
#2
2009 Regular Season · Clemson
63.5
2,661 primary · 58.7 efficiency · 13 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Clemson
60.8
2,241 primary · 57.2 efficiency · 10.7 usage
Milestones
4
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
11
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.9305
Bartram Trail · Jacksonville, FL
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
4,902
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.