Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Tulsa paired 246 primary output with 80.1 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 2 | 4 | 44 | 0 | 47.9 |
| 2010 Postseason | Tulsa | 9 | 2 | 23 | 1 | 71.6 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulsa | 9 | 16 | 223 | 5 | 71.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Tulsa paired 246 primary output with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma, Tulsa.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
27.3
Efficiency
80.1
Usage
9
Consistency
76.2
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 23. East Carolina: 44. Oklahoma State: 35. Central Arkansas: 44. Memphis: 32. Notre Dame: 7. Rice: 30. Houston: 4. Southern Miss: 27
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 2 by 76.7. East Carolina: 3 by 97.8. Oklahoma State: 2 by 100. Central Arkansas: 4 by 73.3. Memphis: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 1 by 46.7. Rice: 2 by 100. Houston: 1 by 26.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.