Player Stats

Landry Jones College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
16,271
Passing yards
16,646
Touchdowns
126

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2009 PostseasonOklahoma12396418-22355.6
2009 Regular SeasonOklahoma122,6892,780-912355.6
2010 PostseasonOklahoma14426429-3365.6
2010 Regular SeasonOklahoma144,1644,289-1253665.6
2011 PostseasonOklahoma13153161-8163.2
2011 Regular SeasonOklahoma134,2864,302-163063.2
2012 PostseasonOklahoma13271278-7159.8
2012 Regular SeasonOklahoma133,8863,989-1032959.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason

Oklahoma paired 4,590 primary output with 57.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 60.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia

Win with 554 yards of offense and 85.7 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Oklahoma

Games

13

Primary Metric / G

319.8

Efficiency

60.9

Usage

4.6

Consistency

77.5

Best Game by takeover score

West Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 271. UTEP: 203. Florida A&M: 242. Kansas State: 278. Texas Tech: 259. Texas: 311. Kansas: 284. Notre Dame: 340. Iowa State: 410. Baylor: 267. West Virginia: 554. Oklahoma State: 494. TCU: 244

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 49 by 53.2. UTEP: 39 by 52.4. Florida A&M: 29 by 57.1. Kansas State: 45 by 53.4. Texas Tech: 40 by 72.2. Texas: 38 by 54.6. Kansas: 30 by 63.8. Notre Dame: 53 by 54.7. Iowa State: 46 by 69.6. Baylor: 37 by 55.6. West Virginia: 51 by 85.7. Oklahoma State: 72 by 54.5. TCU: 40 by 65.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins326.8 · Games = 10 · +30.5 vs Losses
Losses296.3 · Games = 3 · -30.5 vs Wins