Player Stats

Curt Phillips College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
890
Passing yards
642
Rushing yards
248
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonWisconsin420365138042.3
2010 Regular SeasonWisconsin00000-
2011 Regular SeasonWisconsin00000-
2012 PostseasonWisconsin61478364160.6
2012 Regular SeasonWisconsin649245735460.6
2013 PostseasonWisconsin344377014.9
2013 Regular SeasonWisconsin3404014.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Wisconsin paired 639 primary output with 52.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 32.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · Wisconsin

Games

3

Primary Metric / G

16

Efficiency

32.3

Usage

2.1

Consistency

15.3

Best Game by takeover score

South Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 44. Purdue: 2. Indiana: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 13 by 46.8. Purdue: 3 by 30. Indiana: 1 by 20

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2 · Games = 2 · -42 vs Losses
Losses44 · Games = 1 · +42 vs Wins