Player Stats

Aldarius Johnson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
765
Receptions
62
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2008 PostseasonMiami11111067.4
2008 Regular SeasonMiami1130321367.4
2009 Regular SeasonMiami816276168
2010 Regular SeasonMiami1115157046.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season

Miami paired 276 primary output with 96.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 67.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida A&M

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Regular Season · Miami

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

14.3

Efficiency

67.3

Usage

7.8

Consistency

44.7

Best Game by takeover score

Florida A&M

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida A&M: 43. Ohio State: 9. Pittsburgh: 17. Clemson: 8. Florida State: 23. Duke: 9. North Carolina: 10. Maryland: 7. Georgia Tech: 15. Virginia Tech: 5. South Florida: 11

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida A&M: 3 by 95.6. Ohio State: 1 by 60. Pittsburgh: 1 by 100. Clemson: 1 by 53.3. Florida State: 3 by 51.1. Duke: 1 by 60. North Carolina: 1 by 66.7. Maryland: 1 by 46.7. Georgia Tech: 1 by 100. Virginia Tech: 1 by 33.3. South Florida: 1 by 73.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins15.6 · Games = 7 · +3.6 vs Losses
Losses12 · Games = 4 · -3.6 vs Wins