Usage / Role
8%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2012Maryland
TE • 6'4" • Flemington, NJ, USA
Matt Furstenburg reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
8%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
30
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
30
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
41
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Maryland
Snapshot
Player Story
Matt Furstenburg built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a tight end from Flemington, NJ wearing No. 89, spending time with Maryland. The clearest part of Matt Furstenburg's career was his receiving role:...
Read the storyMatt Furstenburg, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Maryland. Matt Furstenburg reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Maryland | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 44.6 |
| 2010 Postseason | Maryland | 6 | 2 | 40 | 0 | 59.5 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Maryland | 6 | 10 | 166 | 1 | 59.5 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Maryland | 11 | 31 | 348 | 2 | 59.1 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Maryland | 8 | 16 | 206 | 2 | 58.6 |
Related Context
Matt Furstenburg played TE for Maryland. Across 4 tracked seasons, Matt Furstenburg recorded 769 receiving yards and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Maryland.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Maryland paired 206 primary output with 86.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
25.8
Efficiency
75
Usage
11.9
Consistency
60.5
Best Game by takeover score
West Virginia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. William & Mary: 11. Temple: 22. West Virginia: 65. Wake Forest: 15. Virginia: 22. NC State: 13. Boston College: 21. North Carolina: 37
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. William & Mary: 2 by 36.7. Temple: 1 by 100. West Virginia: 4 by 100. Wake Forest: 2 by 50. Virginia: 1 by 100. NC State: 2 by 43.3. Boston College: 2 by 70. North Carolina: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ North Carolina | L 38-45 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Boston College | L 17-20 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs NC State | L 18-20 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Virginia | W 27-20 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Wake Forest | W 19-14 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ West Virginia | L 21-31 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Temple | W 36-27 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs William & Mary | W 7-6 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
Player Story
Matt Furstenburg built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a tight end from Flemington, NJ wearing No. 89, spending time with Maryland. The clearest part of Matt Furstenburg's career was his receiving role: 60 catches, 769 receiving yards, and 5 touchdowns across 26 career games in the available record. His career also includes 21 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Matt Furstenburg's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Maryland
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Maryland | 9 | 60 | 4.8 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Maryland | 206 | 86.7 | 14.9 | 197 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Maryland | 206 | 86.7 | 14.9 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Maryland | 348 | 59 | 13.8 | 142 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Maryland | 206 | 75 | 11.9 | -142 |
#1 Featured game
vs Clemson
Week 7 · L 45-56 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104
Receiving Yards
99.3 takeover
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Clemson
Week 7 · L 7-31 · Conference game
98
Receiving Yards
88.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ West Virginia
Week 4 · L 21-31
65
Receiving Yards
88.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs Morgan State
Week 2 · W 62-3
48
Receiving Yards
80 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Miami
Week 1 · W 32-24 · Conference game
68
Receiving Yards
69.5 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · Maryland
206 primary output · 86.7 efficiency · 14.9 usage
59.5
#2
2010 Regular Season · Maryland
59.5
206 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 14.9 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Maryland
59.1
348 primary · 59 efficiency · 13.8 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.