Usage Score
2.1
Player Dossier
2016-2019Georgia
Michael Barnett
DT • 6'4" • 304 lbs • Ridgeville, SC, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Michael Barnett shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 11.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
11.1
Consistency
6.7
Season Value
6.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Georgia
1617181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Georgia
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Barnett, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Georgia. Michael Barnett shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 11.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Georgia paired 0 primary output with 6.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 11.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Georgia
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
11.1
Usage
2.1
Consistency
6.7
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 0. Unknown: 0. Arkansas State: 0. Notre Dame: 0. Tennessee: 0.5. South Carolina: 0. Kentucky: 0. Auburn: 0. Texas A&M: 1. Georgia Tech: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Vanderbilt: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Arkansas State: 2 by 8.3. Notre Dame: 1 by 4.2. Tennessee: 2 by 13.3. South Carolina: 5 by 20.8. Kentucky: 3 by 12.5. Auburn: 1 by 4.2. Texas A&M: 2 by 18.3. Georgia Tech: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.2 · Games = 8
First Half0.1 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs First Half
All Games0.1 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
20.8 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Georgia Tech | W 52-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Texas A&M | W 19-13 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Auburn | W 21-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Kentucky | W 21-0 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs South Carolina | L 17-20 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Tennessee | W 43-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/22 | vs Notre Dame | W 23-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Arkansas State | W 55-0 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Vanderbilt | W 30-6 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Georgia | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Georgia | 0 | 6.9 | 1.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Georgia | 1 | 6.8 | 1 | 1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Georgia | 1 | 6.8 | 1 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Georgia | 1.5 | 11.1 | 2.1 | 0.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 40.1 takeover score.
#2
South Carolina
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 36.7 takeover score.
#3
Tennessee
0.5
Primary metric
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 22.4 takeover score.
#4
South Carolina
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 8.1 takeover score.
#5
Georgia Tech
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 5.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Georgia
0 primary output · 6.9 efficiency · 1.4 usage
36.1
#2
2019 Regular Season · Georgia
6.5
1.5 primary · 11.1 efficiency · 2.1 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Georgia
3.8
1 primary · 6.8 efficiency · 1 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9091
Woodland · Dorchester, SC
- Committed To
- Georgia
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
42
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.