Usage Score
9.3
Player Dossier
2015-2018Clemson
Austin Bryant
DE • 6'5" • 265 lbs • Pavo, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Austin Bryant shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
28.9
Consistency
42.3
Season Value
32.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Clemson
15161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Bryant, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Clemson. Austin Bryant shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Clemson paired 25.5 primary output with 31 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 28.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Clemson
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
28.9
Usage
9.3
Consistency
42.3
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 5. Unknown: 0.5. Texas A&M: 2. Georgia Southern: 4. Georgia Tech: 2. Syracuse: 0.5. Wake Forest: 0. NC State: 0.5. Florida State: 0. Louisville: 2. Boston College: 3.5. Duke: 0. South Carolina: 3. Pittsburgh: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 6 by 75. Unknown: 2 by 13.3. Texas A&M: 4 by 36.7. Georgia Southern: 3 by 52.5. Georgia Tech: 3 by 32.5. Syracuse: 4 by 21.7. Wake Forest: 1 by 4.2. NC State: 2 by 13.3. Florida State: 1 by 4.2. Louisville: 2 by 28.3. Boston College: 6 by 60. Duke: 1 by 4.2. South Carolina: 2 by 38.3. Pittsburgh: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Wins1.7 · n=13
First Half2 · n=7 · +0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · n=7 · -0.7 vs First Half
All Games1.6 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
75 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs Notre Dame2+ sacks · Splash game | W 30-3 | 6 | 4 | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/2 | @ Pittsburgh | W 42-10 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/25 | vs South CarolinaSplash game | W 56-35 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Duke | W 35-6 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Boston CollegeSplash game | W 27-7 | 6 | 1 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Louisville | W 77-16 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Florida State | W 59-10 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs NC State | W 41-7 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Wake Forest | W 63-3 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Syracuse | W 27-23 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Georgia Tech | W 49-21 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Georgia Southern2+ sacks · Splash game | W 38-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Texas A&MSplash game | W 28-26 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Clemson | 6.5 | 16.4 | 4.8 | 6.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 6.5 | 16.4 | 4.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Clemson | 25.5 | 31 | 9.4 | 19 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 25.5 | 31 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Clemson | 23 | 28.9 | 9.3 | -2.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 23 | 28.9 | 9.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Auburn
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
8
Primary metric
8 disruption/tackle impact with 66.4 takeover score.
#2
Notre Dame
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 66 takeover score.
#3
Georgia Southern
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 50.4 takeover score.
#4
Florida State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.9 takeover score.
#5
Boston College
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Clemson
25.5 primary output · 31 efficiency · 9.4 usage
34.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · Clemson
34.4
25.5 primary · 31 efficiency · 9.4 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Clemson
32.1
23 primary · 28.9 efficiency · 9.3 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
10
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.919
Thomas County Central · Thomasville, GA
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
104
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.