Usage Score
3.6
Player Dossier
2015-2018Clemson
DT • 6'3" • 305 lbs • Orangeburg, SC, USA
Albert Huggins shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 11.9 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.6
Efficiency
11.9
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
13.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Albert Huggins, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Clemson. Albert Huggins shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 11.9 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Clemson paired 7.5 primary output with 17.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 11.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
11.9
Usage
3.6
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 0. Unknown: 1. Georgia Southern: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Syracuse: 0. Wake Forest: 1. Florida State: 2. Boston College: 0. Duke: 0. South Carolina: 2. Pittsburgh: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Georgia Southern: 2 by 8.3. Georgia Tech: 3 by 12.5. Syracuse: 1 by 4.2. Wake Forest: 1 by 14.2. Florida State: 1 by 24.2. Boston College: 1 by 4.2. Duke: 2 by 8.3. South Carolina: 1 by 24.2. Pittsburgh: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
24.2 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs Notre Dame | W 30-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/2 | @ Pittsburgh | W 42-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/25 | vs South Carolina | W 56-35 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Duke | W 35-6 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Boston College | W 27-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Florida State | W 59-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Wake Forest | W 63-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Syracuse | W 27-23 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Georgia Tech | W 49-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Georgia Southern | W 38-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 6 | 16.9 | 4.1 | 6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 7.5 | 17.1 | 5.2 | 1.5 |
| 2018 Postseason | Clemson | 6 | 11.9 | 3.6 | -1.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 6 | 11.9 | 3.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.3 takeover score.
#2
Florida State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.5 takeover score.
#3
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.4 takeover score.
#4
Florida State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.4 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
1.5
Primary metric
Game with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 32.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Clemson
7.5 primary output · 17.1 efficiency · 5.2 usage
22.3
#2
2016 Regular Season · Clemson
13.6
6 primary · 16.9 efficiency · 4.1 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Clemson
13.1
6 primary · 11.9 efficiency · 3.6 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9583
Orangeburg-Wilkinson · Orangeburg, SC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
58
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Albert Huggins quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit