Player Stats

Reggie Gallaspy II College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,201
Rushing yards
2,074
Receiving yards
127
Touchdowns
29

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2015 Regular SeasonNC State1035531639442
2016 PostseasonNC State1026260134.1
2016 Regular SeasonNC State102172089134.1
2017 PostseasonNC State1373703255
2017 Regular SeasonNC State1348543649555
2018 PostseasonNC State12917912072.6
2018 Regular SeasonNC State12954939151672.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

NC State paired 1,045 primary output with 46.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 46.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · NC State

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

87.1

Efficiency

46.8

Usage

29.5

Consistency

59.5

Best Game by takeover score

East Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 91. James Madison: 68. Georgia State: 24. Marshall: 81. Virginia: 52. Boston College: 104. Clemson: 67. Syracuse: 65. Florida State: 106. Wake Forest: 36. North Carolina: 129. East Carolina: 222

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 15 by 60.5. James Madison: 17 by 41.7. Georgia State: 11 by 22.7. Marshall: 22 by 38.4. Virginia: 15 by 35.4. Boston College: 25 by 43.3. Clemson: 10 by 68.9. Syracuse: 20 by 34.9. Florida State: 21 by 52.6. Wake Forest: 14 by 26.8. North Carolina: 28 by 49.1. East Carolina: 25 by 87

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins98.3 · Games = 8 · +33.5 vs Losses
Losses64.8 · Games = 4 · -33.5 vs Wins