Player Stats

Devine Ozigbo College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,684
Rushing yards
2,196
Receiving yards
488
Touchdowns
21

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2015 PostseasonNebraska8958015035.7
2015 Regular SeasonNebraska817612947135.7
2016 PostseasonNebraska9776611049.8
2016 Regular SeasonNebraska943534689549.8
2017 Regular SeasonNebraska10616493123356
2018 Regular SeasonNebraska121,2851,0822031273.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Nebraska paired 1,285 primary output with 62.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 62.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Purdue

Loss with 198 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Nebraska

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

107.1

Efficiency

62.8

Usage

24.4

Consistency

62.2

Best Game by takeover score

Purdue

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Colorado: 77. Troy: 32. Michigan: 10. Purdue: 198. Wisconsin: 29. Northwestern: 192. Minnesota: 177. Bethune-Cookman: 110. Ohio State: 99. Illinois: 198. Michigan State: 94. Iowa: 69

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Colorado: 16 by 46.8. Troy: 10 by 30.7. Michigan: 7 by 11.2. Purdue: 19 by 93.4. Wisconsin: 5 by 60.4. Northwestern: 26 by 75.9. Minnesota: 15 by 99.2. Bethune-Cookman: 11 by 91.7. Ohio State: 21 by 46.5. Illinois: 14 by 100. Michigan State: 21 by 44.3. Iowa: 13 by 53.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins144.8 · Games = 4 · +56.5 vs Losses
Losses88.3 · Games = 8 · -56.5 vs Wins