Usage Score
11.9
Player Dossier
2016-2019Nebraska
Khalil Davis
DL • 6'2" • 315 lbs • Blue Springs, MO, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Khalil Davis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
35.8
Consistency
60.8
Season Value
38.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Nebraska
16171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Nebraska
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Khalil Davis, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Nebraska. Khalil Davis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Nebraska paired 21 primary output with 35.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 35.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Nebraska
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.9
Efficiency
35.8
Usage
11.9
Consistency
60.8
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 2. Colorado: 2. Northern Illinois: 0. Illinois: 2. Ohio State: 3. Minnesota: 0. Indiana: 2. Purdue: 4.5. Wisconsin: 0. Maryland: 4.5. Iowa: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 3 by 32.5. Colorado: 5 by 40.8. Northern Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Illinois: 3 by 32.5. Ohio State: 5 by 50.8. Minnesota: 4 by 16.7. Indiana: 2 by 28.3. Purdue: 7 by 74.2. Wisconsin: 6 by 25. Maryland: 4 by 61.7. Iowa: 4 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins2.1 · Games = 4 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses1.8 · Games = 7 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half1.5 · Games = 6 · -0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half2.4 · Games = 5 · +0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
74.2 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | vs Iowa | L 24-27 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Maryland2+ sacks · Splash game | W 54-7 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Wisconsin | L 21-37 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ PurdueSplash game | L 27-31 | 7 | 5 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Indiana | L 31-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Minnesota | L 7-34 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Ohio StateSplash game | L 7-48 | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/22 | @ Illinois | W 42-38 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/15 | vs Northern Illinois | W 44-8 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ ColoradoSplash game | L 31-34 | 5 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs South Alabama | W 35-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Nebraska
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Nebraska | 2 | 10.2 | 4.6 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Nebraska | 7 | 14.7 | 5.4 | 5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Nebraska | 11 | 23.4 | 7.3 | 4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Nebraska | 21 | 35.8 | 11.9 | 10 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 65.2 takeover score.
#2
Maryland
4.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.1 takeover score.
#3
Colorado
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.3 takeover score.
#4
Northern Illinois
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.9 takeover score.
#5
Wyoming
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Nebraska
21 primary output · 35.8 efficiency · 11.9 usage
38.8
#2
2018 Regular Season · Nebraska
17.3
11 primary · 23.4 efficiency · 7.3 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Nebraska
11.7
7 primary · 14.7 efficiency · 5.4 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
9
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8758
Blue Springs · Blue Springs, MO
- Committed To
- Nebraska
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
105
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.