Player Stats

Mohamed Barry College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
245
TFL
15.5
Sacks
3
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonNebraska70-0--036.5
2016 Regular SeasonNebraska76-0--036.5
2017 Regular SeasonNebraska113810-1015.4
2018 Regular SeasonNebraska1211211251074.1
2019 Regular SeasonNebraska12893.511-035.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Nebraska paired 19 primary output with 54.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 35.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Colorado

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Regular Season · Nebraska

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

35.5

Usage

7.5

Consistency

13.9

Best Game by takeover score

Colorado

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 0. Colorado: 2. Northern Illinois: 1. Illinois: 0. Ohio State: 0. Northwestern: 1. Minnesota: 0.5. Indiana: 1. Purdue: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Maryland: 0. Iowa: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 12 by 50. Colorado: 6 by 45. Northern Illinois: 10 by 51.7. Illinois: 5 by 20.8. Ohio State: 8 by 33.3. Northwestern: 8 by 43.3. Minnesota: 11 by 50.8. Indiana: 6 by 35. Purdue: 3 by 12.5. Wisconsin: 12 by 50. Maryland: 2 by 8.3. Iowa: 6 by 25

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 7 · +0.1 vs Wins