Usage Score
16.3
Player Dossier
2015-2018TCU
Jarrison Stewart
WR • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Mesquite, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jarrison Stewart reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
51.9
Consistency
63.1
Season Value
53.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · TCU
1515161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jarrison Stewart, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · TCU. Jarrison Stewart reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
TCU paired 265 primary output with 74.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 51.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · TCU
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
23.3
Efficiency
51.9
Usage
16.3
Consistency
63.1
Best Game by takeover score
California
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 4. Unknown: 6. Ohio State: 37. Texas: 27. Iowa State: 22. Oklahoma: 3. Kansas: 33. Kansas State: 54
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 1 by 26.7. Unknown: 1 by 40. Ohio State: 3 by 82.2. Texas: 2 by 90. Iowa State: 5 by 29.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 20. Kansas: 4 by 55. Kansas State: 5 by 72
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins26.7 · Games = 3 · +1.7 vs Losses
Losses25 · Games = 4 · -1.7 vs Wins
First Half18.5 · Games = 4 · -9.5 vs Second Half
Second Half28 · Games = 4 · +9.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas State
Best efficiency game
90 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | vs California | W 10-7 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Kansas State | W 14-13 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Kansas | L 26-27 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Oklahoma | L 27-52 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Iowa State | W 17-14 | — | 5 | 22 | 4.4 | 4.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Texas | L 16-31 | — | 2 | 27 | 10.3 | 13.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/16 | vs Ohio State | L 28-40 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Postseason | TCU | 265 | 74.3 | 8.3 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | TCU | 265 | 74.3 | 8.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | TCU | 96 | 50.1 | 7.7 | -169 |
| 2016 Regular Season | TCU | 96 | 50.1 | 7.7 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | TCU | 102 | 70 | 8.7 | 6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | TCU | 102 | 70 | 8.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | TCU | 186 | 51.9 | 16.3 | 84 |
| 2018 Regular Season | TCU | 186 | 51.9 | 16.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88
Primary metric
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Baylor
72
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
Kansas State
54
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 72 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 64.4 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · TCU
265 primary output · 74.3 efficiency · 8.3 usage
57.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · TCU
57.3
265 primary · 74.3 efficiency · 8.3 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · TCU
53.2
186 primary · 51.9 efficiency · 16.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8167
Tatum · Tatum, TX
- Committed To
- Lamar
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
649
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.