Usage Score
0.1
Player Dossier
2015-2019Auburn
Jay Jay Wilson
LB • 6'3" • 249 lbs • Valencia, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jay Jay Wilson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 0.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
0.5
Consistency
100
Season Value
33.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Arizona State
15161717181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Arizona State • Auburn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jay Jay Wilson, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Arizona State. Jay Jay Wilson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 0.5 disruption score.
Jay Jay Wilson played LB for Arizona State and Auburn. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jay Jay Wilson recorded 1 rushing yards, 230 receiving yards, and 61 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Auburn.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 0.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arizona State, Auburn.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Auburn
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
0.5
Usage
0.1
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Minnesota
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 0. Kent State: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Florida: 0. Arkansas: 0. LSU: 0. Ole Miss: 0. Alabama: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 6 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0 · Games = 5 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 4 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Alabama
Best efficiency game
4.2 vs Alabama
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Minnesota | L 24-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Alabama | W 48-45 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Ole Miss | W 20-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ LSU | L 20-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Arkansas | W 51-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Florida | L 13-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Mississippi State | W 56-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Texas A&M | W 28-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Kent State | W 55-16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona State
2015-2018
Opening stop
- 2
Auburn
2019
Final stop
Season Progression
2015201620172017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Arizona State | 9 | 25.6 | 7.3 | 9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona State | 9 | 25.6 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona State | 1.5 | 15.2 | 2.9 | -7.5 |
| 2019 Postseason | Auburn | 0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | -1.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Auburn | 0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oregon State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 65.2 takeover score.
#2
Utah
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.1 takeover score.
#3
San Diego State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.3 takeover score.
#4
Colorado
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 38.4 takeover score.
#5
USC
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 26.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Arizona State
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2016 Regular Season · Arizona State
34
0 primary · 1.7 efficiency · 0.3 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Auburn
33.5
0 primary · 0.5 efficiency · 0.1 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.8931
Valencia · Valencia, CA
- Committed To
- Arizona State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
61
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.