Usage Score
10.9
Player Dossier
2016-2019Arizona State
LB • 6'1" • 224 lbs • Rancho Cucamonga, CA, USA
Khaylan Kearse-Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.9
Efficiency
37
Consistency
51.1
Season Value
49.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Arizona State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Khaylan Kearse-Thomas, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Arizona State. Khaylan Kearse-Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 37 disruption score.
Khaylan Kearse-Thomas played LB for Arizona State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Khaylan Kearse-Thomas recorded 114 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Arizona State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Arizona State paired 21 primary output with 37 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 37 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
37
Usage
10.9
Consistency
51.1
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 3. Kent State: 4.5. Sacramento State: 0. Michigan State: 1.5. Colorado: 0. California: 1. Washington State: 0. Utah: 0. UCLA: 3. USC: 2. Oregon State: 3. Oregon: 3. Arizona: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 9 by 67.5. Kent State: 5 by 65.8. Sacramento State: 4 by 16.7. Michigan State: 3 by 27.5. Colorado: 11 by 45.8. California: 2 by 18.3. Washington State: 1 by 4.2. Utah: 1 by 4.2. UCLA: 3 by 42.5. USC: 7 by 49.2. Oregon State: 11 by 75.8. Oregon: 7 by 59.2. Arizona: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
75.8 vs Oregon State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | vs Florida StateSplash game | W 20-14 | 9 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/1 | vs Arizona | W 24-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | vs OregonSplash game | W 31-28 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Oregon State10+ tackles · Splash game | L 34-35 | 11 | 8 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs USCSplash game | L 26-31 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ UCLASplash game | L 32-42 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Utah | L 3-21 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Washington State | W 38-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ California | W 24-17 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/22 | vs Colorado10+ tackles | L 31-34 | 11 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Michigan State | W 10-7 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Sacramento State | W 19-7 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Kent StateSplash game | W 30-7 | 5 | 4 | — | 3 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Arizona State | 2.5 | 13.7 | 4.3 | 2.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona State | 2.5 | 13.7 | 4.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Arizona State | 8 | 19.4 | 7 | 5.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona State | 8 | 19.4 | 7 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Arizona State | 21 | 37 | 10.9 | 13 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arizona State | 21 | 37 | 10.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.3 takeover score.
#2
NC State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 56.4 takeover score.
#3
Oregon State
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.5 takeover score.
#4
Oregon
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.9 takeover score.
#5
Florida State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Postseason · Arizona State
21 primary output · 37 efficiency · 10.9 usage
49.8
#2
2019 Regular Season · Arizona State
49.8
21 primary · 37 efficiency · 10.9 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Arizona State
19.9
8 primary · 19.4 efficiency · 7 usage
1
Impact games
10
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9009
Etiwanda · Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
114
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.