Usage Score
5.9
Player Dossier
2013-2019LSU
Breiden Fehoko
DL • 6'2" • 291 lbs • Honolulu, HI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Breiden Fehoko shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
18.7
Consistency
56.2
Season Value
29.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Texas Tech
131415161819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas Tech • LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Breiden Fehoko, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Texas Tech. Breiden Fehoko shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Texas Tech paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 18.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas Tech, LSU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · LSU
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
18.7
Usage
5.9
Consistency
56.2
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0.5. Vanderbilt: 3. Utah State: 1. Florida: 1. Mississippi State: 1. Auburn: 0. Arkansas: 1. Texas A&M: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 13.3. Vanderbilt: 4 by 46.7. Utah State: 3 by 22.5. Florida: 2 by 18.3. Mississippi State: 2 by 18.3. Auburn: 1 by 4.2. Arkansas: 2 by 18.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1 · Games = 7
First Half1.4 · Games = 4 · +0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half0.5 · Games = 4 · -0.9 vs First Half
All Games0.9 · Games = 8
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Vanderbilt
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/1 | vs Texas A&M | W 50-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Arkansas | W 56-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Auburn | W 23-20 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Mississippi State | W 36-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/13 | vs Florida | W 42-28 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Utah State | W 42-6 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ VanderbiltSplash game | W 66-38 | 4 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2013-2016
Opening stop
- 2
LSU
2018-2019
Final stop
Season Progression
201320142015201620182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 4.5 | 12.4 | 6.7 | 3.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | LSU | 5.5 | 15.2 | 3.5 | 1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | LSU | 7.5 | 18.7 | 5.9 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
3.5
Primary metric
Game with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 58.5 takeover score.
#3
Vanderbilt
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.1 takeover score.
#4
Kansas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.3 takeover score.
#5
TCU
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 33.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Texas Tech
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
41.7
#2
2019 Regular Season · LSU
29.6
7.5 primary · 18.7 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · LSU
14.7
5.5 primary · 15.2 efficiency · 3.5 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.9752
Farrington · Honolulu, HI
- Committed To
- Texas Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
53
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.