Usage Score
8.8
Player Dossier
2014-2018Kentucky
S • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Mike Edwards shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.8
Efficiency
39.3
Consistency
44.9
Season Value
27.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Kentucky
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mike Edwards, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Kentucky. Mike Edwards shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.3 disruption score.
Mike Edwards played S for Kentucky. Across 5 tracked seasons, Mike Edwards recorded 278 tackles and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Kentucky.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Kentucky paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 39.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
39.3
Usage
8.8
Consistency
44.9
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 0. Central Michigan: 0.5. Florida: 1. Unknown: 1. Mississippi State: 0. South Carolina: 2. Texas A&M: 3. Vanderbilt: 1. Missouri: 2. Georgia: 1. Tennessee: 2.5. Middle Tennessee: 3. Louisville: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 5 by 20.8. Central Michigan: 2 by 13.3. Florida: 6 by 35. Unknown: 5 by 30.8. Mississippi State: 6 by 25. South Carolina: 5 by 40.8. Texas A&M: 9 by 67.5. Vanderbilt: 9 by 47.5. Missouri: 4 by 36.7. Georgia: 11 by 55.8. Tennessee: 6 by 50. Middle Tennessee: 12 by 80. Louisville: 2 by 8.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
80 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Penn State | W 27-24 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/25 | @ Louisville | W 56-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Middle Tennessee10+ tackles · Splash game | W 34-23 | 12 | 7 | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Tennessee | L 7-24 | 6 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Georgia10+ tackles | L 17-34 | 11 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Missouri | W 15-14 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Vanderbilt | W 14-7 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Texas A&MSplash game | L 14-20 | 9 | 7 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs South CarolinaSplash game | W 24-10 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Mississippi State | W 28-7 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Florida | W 27-16 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Central Michigan | W 35-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kentucky
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Kentucky | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Kentucky | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Kentucky | 17 | 44.8 | 10.1 | 16 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Kentucky | 17 | 44.8 | 10.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Kentucky | 16 | 43.1 | 10.9 | -1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Kentucky | 16 | 43.1 | 10.9 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Kentucky | 17 | 39.3 | 8.8 | 1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Kentucky | 17 | 39.3 | 8.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
New Mexico State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 69.3 takeover score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 65.4 takeover score.
#3
Texas A&M
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 61.4 takeover score.
#4
Charlotte
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Kentucky
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.4
#2
2017 Postseason · Kentucky
33.4
16 primary · 43.1 efficiency · 10.9 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Kentucky
33.4
16 primary · 43.1 efficiency · 10.9 usage
4
Impact games
5
Splash games
11
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8917
Winton Woods · Cincinnati, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
278
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.