Usage Score
17.9
Player Dossier
2011-2015Iowa
TE • 6'4" • Mount Pleasant, IA, USA
Henry Krieger-Coble reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17.9
Efficiency
74.7
Consistency
58.1
Season Value
62.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Iowa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Henry Krieger-Coble, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Iowa. Henry Krieger-Coble reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Henry Krieger-Coble played TE for Iowa. Across 5 tracked seasons, Henry Krieger-Coble recorded 433 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Iowa.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Iowa paired 405 primary output with 74.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
33.8
Efficiency
74.7
Usage
17.9
Consistency
58.1
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 20. Iowa State: 34. Pittsburgh: 48. North Texas: 23. Illinois: 32. Northwestern: 28. Maryland: 15. Indiana: 21. Minnesota: 61. Purdue: 76. Nebraska: 24. Michigan State: 23
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 3 by 44.4. Iowa State: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 5 by 64. North Texas: 3 by 51.1. Illinois: 5 by 42.7. Northwestern: 2 by 93.3. Maryland: 1 by 100. Indiana: 2 by 70. Minnesota: 3 by 100. Purdue: 4 by 100. Nebraska: 2 by 80. Michigan State: 3 by 51.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | vs Stanford | L 16-45 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 12/6 | vs Michigan State | L 13-16 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 11/27 | @ Nebraska | W 28-20 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Purdue | W 40-20 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 24 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Minnesota | W 40-35 | — | 3 | 61 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Indiana | W 35-27 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Maryland | W 31-15 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Northwestern | W 40-10 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Illinois | W 29-20 | — | 5 | 32 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs North Texas | W 62-16 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Pittsburgh | W 27-24 | — | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Iowa State | W 31-17 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 29 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Iowa
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Iowa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Iowa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Iowa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Iowa | 28 | 62.2 | 4.8 | 28 |
| 2015 Postseason | Iowa | 405 | 74.7 | 17.9 | 377 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Iowa | 405 | 74.7 | 17.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Minnesota
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Pittsburgh
13
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
13
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa State
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Iowa
405 primary output · 74.7 efficiency · 17.9 usage
62.7
#2
2015 Regular Season · Iowa
62.7
405 primary · 74.7 efficiency · 17.9 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Iowa
32.2
28 primary · 62.2 efficiency · 4.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8674
Patriot · Nokesville, VA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
433
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.