Player Stats

Parker Hesse College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
137
TFL
27.5
Sacks
11.5
QB hurries
8
Passes defended
7
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonIowa00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonIowa10-0--141.6
2016 PostseasonIowa123-0-1052
2016 Regular SeasonIowa12337.53.522052
2017 PostseasonIowa1340.50.5-1069.1
2017 Regular SeasonIowa1339103.532069.1
2018 PostseasonIowa1360.50--059.1
2018 Regular SeasonIowa13529431059.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Iowa paired 21.5 primary output with 30.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 32.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Iowa

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

32.1

Usage

9.6

Consistency

43

Best Game by takeover score

Northern Illinois

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 0.5. Northern Illinois: 4. Iowa State: 2. Northern Iowa: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Minnesota: 1. Indiana: 2. Maryland: 3. Penn State: 2. Purdue: 0. Northwestern: 2. Illinois: 1. Nebraska: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 6 by 30. Northern Illinois: 4 by 56.7. Iowa State: 1 by 24.2. Northern Iowa: 5 by 20.8. Wisconsin: 7 by 29.2. Minnesota: 2 by 18.3. Indiana: 7 by 49.2. Maryland: 5 by 50.8. Penn State: 4 by 36.7. Purdue: 4 by 16.7. Northwestern: 5 by 40.8. Illinois: 5 by 30.8. Nebraska: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.5 · Games = 9 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 4 · -0.5 vs Wins