Player Stats

Christian Pabico College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
420
Receptions
31
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonUCLA0-00-
2015 Regular SeasonUCLA0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonUCLA0-00-
2017 PostseasonUCLA9111062.8
2017 Regular SeasonUCLA917269162.8
2018 Regular SeasonUCLA713140055.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

UCLA paired 280 primary output with 80 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 76.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · UCLA

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

20

Efficiency

76.2

Usage

10

Consistency

63.2

Best Game by takeover score

Arizona State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 8. Oklahoma: 22. Fresno State: 16. Oregon: 15. Arizona State: 36. USC: 12. Stanford: 31

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 2 by 26.7. Oklahoma: 1 by 100. Fresno State: 1 by 100. Oregon: 1 by 100. Arizona State: 3 by 80. USC: 3 by 26.7. Stanford: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins12 · Games = 1 · -9.3 vs Losses
Losses21.3 · Games = 6 · +9.3 vs Wins