Player Stats

Fred Trevillion College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
925
Receptions
34
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonSan Diego State0-00-
2015 Regular SeasonSan Diego State0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonSan Diego State0-00-
2017 PostseasonSan Diego State7334063.2
2017 Regular SeasonSan Diego State79293263.2
2018 PostseasonSan Diego State11-0076.5
2018 Regular SeasonSan Diego State1122598376.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

San Diego State paired 598 primary output with 94 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 94 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · San Diego State

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

54.4

Efficiency

94

Usage

22.4

Consistency

37

Best Game by takeover score

Fresno State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 0. Stanford: 29. Sacramento State: 25. Eastern Michigan: 40. Boise State: 57. Air Force: 94. San José State: 37. Nevada: 30. UNLV: 9. Fresno State: 189. Hawai'i: 88

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 2 by 96.7. Sacramento State: 2 by 83.3. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 100. Boise State: 3 by 100. Air Force: 3 by 100. San José State: 2 by 100. Nevada: 1 by 100. UNLV: 1 by 60. Fresno State: 4 by 100. Hawai'i: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins50.6 · Games = 5 · -6.9 vs Losses
Losses57.5 · Games = 6 · +6.9 vs Wins