Usage Score
23.3
Player Dossier
2014-2018South Florida
Tyre McCants
WR • 5'11" • 240 lbs • Niceville, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Tyre McCants reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.3
Consistency
48.1
Season Value
57.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · South Florida
141515161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- South Florida
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyre McCants, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · South Florida. Tyre McCants reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
South Florida paired 686 primary output with 93.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 64.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · South Florida
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
47.5
Efficiency
64.3
Usage
23.3
Consistency
48.1
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 10. Unknown: 26. Georgia Tech: 99. Illinois: 77. East Carolina: 12. Massachusetts: 81. Tulsa: 91. UConn: 49. Houston: 18. Tulane: 85. Cincinnati: 29. Temple: 32. UCF: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 1 by 66.7. Unknown: 6 by 28.9. Georgia Tech: 10 by 66. Illinois: 3 by 100. East Carolina: 3 by 26.7. Massachusetts: 4 by 100. Tulsa: 8 by 75.8. UConn: 6 by 54.4. Houston: 2 by 60. Tulane: 9 by 63. Cincinnati: 2 by 96.7. Temple: 3 by 71.1. UCF: 2 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Wins68.2 · n=6 · +37.8 vs Losses
Losses30.3 · n=6 · -37.8 vs Wins
First Half56.6 · n=7 · +19.7 vs Second Half
Second Half36.8 · n=6 · -19.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Massachusetts
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/21 | vs Marshall | L 20-38 | — | 1 | 10 | 6.6 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Fri 11/23 | vs UCF | L 10-38 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Temple | L 17-27 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Cincinnati | L 23-35 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs TulaneHigh volume | L 15-41 | — | 9 | 85 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Houston | L 36-57 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs UConn | W 38-30 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 20 |
| Fri 10/12 | @ TulsaHigh volume | W 25-24 | — | 8 | 91 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Massachusetts | W 58-42 | — | 4 | 81 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 1 | 72 |
| Sun 9/23 | vs East Carolina | W 20-13 | — | 3 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Illinois | W 25-19 | — | 3 | 77 | 15 | 25.70 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Georgia TechHigh volume | W 49-38 | — | 10 | 99 | 9.5 | 9.90 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 26 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 1 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
South Florida
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | South Florida | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Postseason | South Florida | 164 | 66.7 | 9.3 | 164 |
| 2015 Regular Season | South Florida | 164 | 66.7 | 9.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | South Florida | 384 | 78 | 15.5 | 220 |
| 2016 Regular Season | South Florida | 384 | 78 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | South Florida | 686 | 93.9 | 19.1 | 302 |
| 2017 Regular Season | South Florida | 686 | 93.9 | 19.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | South Florida | 617 | 64.3 | 23.3 | -69 |
| 2018 Regular Season | South Florida | 617 | 64.3 | 23.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UCF
227
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
227 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Western Kentucky
88
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 75.8 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia Tech
99
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 66 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · South Florida
686 primary output · 93.9 efficiency · 19.1 usage
62
#2
2017 Regular Season · South Florida
62
686 primary · 93.9 efficiency · 19.1 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · South Florida
57.8
617 primary · 64.3 efficiency · 23.3 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8564
Niceville · Niceville, FL
- Committed To
- South Florida
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,851
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.