Player Stats

D'Ernest Johnson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,705
Rushing yards
1,796
Receiving yards
909
Touchdowns
32

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonSouth Florida11257150107135.1
2015 PostseasonSouth Florida1317170155
2015 Regular SeasonSouth Florida13646290356655
2016 PostseasonSouth Florida131222795163.6
2016 Regular SeasonSouth Florida137145161981463.6
2017 PostseasonSouth Florida12765125070.7
2017 Regular SeasonSouth Florida12873745128970.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

South Florida paired 949 primary output with 43.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 43.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Temple

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · South Florida

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

79.1

Efficiency

43.6

Usage

24.7

Consistency

68.5

Best Game by takeover score

Temple

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 76. Stony Brook: 15. San José State: 99. Illinois: 138. Temple: 135. East Carolina: 113. Cincinnati: 53. Tulane: 94. Houston: 32. UConn: 41. Tulsa: 122. UCF: 31

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 17 by 38.5. Stony Brook: 13 by 12. San José State: 22 by 46.9. Illinois: 19 by 67.4. Temple: 26 by 49.2. East Carolina: 17 by 71.1. Cincinnati: 17 by 32.5. Tulane: 21 by 44.9. Houston: 14 by 23.8. UConn: 8 by 48.1. Tulsa: 18 by 61.1. UCF: 12 by 27.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins88.6 · Games = 10 · +57.1 vs Losses
Losses31.5 · Games = 2 · -57.1 vs Wins