Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
South Florida paired 4,342 primary output with 73.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | South Florida | 5 | 177 | 111 | 66 | 0 | 21.7 |
| 2015 Postseason | South Florida | 13 | 381 | 273 | 108 | 3 | 75.5 |
| 2015 Regular Season | South Florida | 13 | 2,906 | 2,023 | 883 | 31 | 75.5 |
| 2016 Postseason | South Florida | 13 | 366 | 261 | 105 | 5 | 84.8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | South Florida | 13 | 3,976 | 2,551 | 1,425 | 37 | 84.8 |
| 2017 Postseason | South Florida | 12 | 417 | 311 | 106 | 5 | 73.7 |
| 2017 Regular Season | South Florida | 12 | 3,572 | 2,600 | 972 | 31 | 73.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
South Florida paired 4,342 primary output with 73.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 67.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
332.4
Efficiency
67.3
Usage
31.8
Consistency
65.2
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 417. Stony Brook: 253. San José State: 282. Illinois: 386. Temple: 155. East Carolina: 253. Cincinnati: 264. Tulane: 265. Houston: 332. UConn: 516. Tulsa: 261. UCF: 605
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 48 by 75.5. Stony Brook: 50 by 58.1. San José State: 40 by 67.3. Illinois: 52 by 67.4. Temple: 36 by 54.2. East Carolina: 28 by 80.7. Cincinnati: 44 by 65.3. Tulane: 37 by 67.3. Houston: 52 by 59.2. UConn: 53 by 80.7. Tulsa: 45 by 59.3. UCF: 65 by 72.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.