Player Stats

Devin Lauderdale College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,535
Receptions
105
Touchdowns
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1031589769.8
2015 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1043639468.9
2016 Regular SeasonTexas Tech831307252

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season

Texas Tech paired 589 primary output with 85.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 67.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Regular Season · Texas Tech

Games

8

Receiving Yards / G

38.4

Efficiency

67.6

Usage

10.5

Consistency

57.5

Best Game by takeover score

Kansas State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Stephen F. Austin: 49. Arizona State: 57. Louisiana Tech: 27. Kansas: 24. Kansas State: 92. West Virginia: 14. Oklahoma: 44. Texas: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stephen F. Austin: 7 by 46.7. Arizona State: 7 by 54.3. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 100. Kansas: 4 by 40. Kansas State: 7 by 87.6. West Virginia: 2 by 46.7. Oklahoma: 3 by 97.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins33.3 · Games = 3 · -8.1 vs Losses
Losses41.4 · Games = 5 · +8.1 vs Wins