Player Stats

Chase Hancock College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
295
TFL
19
Sacks
7
QB hurries
15
Passes defended
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonMarshall00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonMarshall00-0--0-
2016 Regular SeasonMarshall10693.51.541051.7
2017 PostseasonMarshall1380.50--073.8
2017 Regular SeasonMarshall131209277073.8
2018 Regular SeasonMarshall119863.545060.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Marshall paired 25.5 primary output with 57.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 53.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Marshall

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.7

Efficiency

53.6

Usage

9.1

Consistency

38.3

Best Game by takeover score

Charlotte

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 2. Eastern Kentucky: 4. NC State: 2. Western Kentucky: 1. Middle Tennessee: 1. Old Dominion: 0. Southern Miss: 2. Charlotte: 5. UTSA: 0.5. Florida International: 1. Virginia Tech: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 11 by 65.8. Eastern Kentucky: 12 by 90. NC State: 8 by 53.3. Western Kentucky: 6 by 35. Middle Tennessee: 9 by 47.5. Old Dominion: 13 by 50. Southern Miss: 7 by 49.2. Charlotte: 7 by 79.2. UTSA: 8 by 38.3. Florida International: 6 by 35. Virginia Tech: 11 by 45.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.9 · Games = 7 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 4 · -0.7 vs Wins