Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2014-2018Fresno State
George Helmuth
LB • 6'1" • 225 lbs • Fresno, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
George Helmuth shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
36.6
Consistency
50.2
Season Value
28.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Fresno State
14151617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Fresno State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Boise State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
George Helmuth, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Fresno State. George Helmuth shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Fresno State paired 0 primary output with 7.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 36.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Fresno State
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
36.6
Usage
10.6
Consistency
50.2
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 2. Unknown: 0. Minnesota: 1. UCLA: 0. Toledo: 4. Nevada: 1. Wyoming: 0. New Mexico: 1. Hawai'i: 0. UNLV: 0. Boise State: 2. San Diego State: 1. San José State: 3. Boise State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 11 by 65.8. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Minnesota: 7 by 39.2. UCLA: 4 by 16.7. Toledo: 5 by 60.8. Nevada: 10 by 51.7. Wyoming: 7 by 29.2. New Mexico: 4 by 26.7. Hawai'i: 2 by 8.3. UNLV: 8 by 33.3. Boise State: 9 by 57.5. San Diego State: 5 by 30.8. San José State: 6 by 55. Boise State: 6 by 25
Split Comparison
Wins1.1 · n=11 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · n=2 · +0.4 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · n=7 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=7 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | vs Arizona State10+ tackles · Splash game | W 31-20 | 11 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/2 | @ Boise State | W 19-16 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/25 | vs San José State | W 31-13 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | vs San Diego State | W 23-14 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Boise State | L 17-24 | 9 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/4 | @ UNLV | W 48-3 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/28 | vs Hawai'i | W 50-20 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ New Mexico | W 38-7 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/14 | vs Wyoming | W 27-3 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/7 | @ Nevada10+ tackles | W 21-3 | 10 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/30 | vs Toledo2+ sacks · Splash game | W 49-27 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/16 | @ UCLA | W 38-14 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Minnesota | L 14-21 | 7 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Fresno State
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Fresno State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Fresno State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Fresno State | 0 | 7.3 | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Fresno State | 13 | 35.8 | 9.4 | 13 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Fresno State | 13 | 35.8 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Fresno State | 15 | 36.6 | 10.6 | 2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Fresno State | 15 | 36.6 | 10.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Boise State
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 63.2 takeover score.
#2
Toledo
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.6 takeover score.
#3
San José State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48.9 takeover score.
#4
Washington
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 46.1 takeover score.
#5
Arizona State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Fresno State
0 primary output · 7.3 efficiency · 1 usage
36.1
#2
2018 Postseason · Fresno State
28.8
15 primary · 36.6 efficiency · 10.6 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Fresno State
28.8
15 primary · 36.6 efficiency · 10.6 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
183
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.