Player Stats

Mike Boone College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,846
Rushing yards
2,250
Receiving yards
596
Touchdowns
25

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2014 PostseasonCincinnati9744925064.8
2014 Regular SeasonCincinnati963860137964.8
2015 PostseasonCincinnati1133321170.6
2015 Regular SeasonCincinnati11824717107870.6
2016 Regular SeasonCincinnati9637388249264.4
2017 Regular SeasonCincinnati10640463177568.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Cincinnati paired 857 primary output with 66.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 43.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UConn

Win with 100 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati

Games

10

Scrimmage Yards / G

64

Efficiency

43.6

Usage

27

Consistency

79.9

Best Game by takeover score

UConn

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Austin Peay: 109. Michigan: 72. Marshall: 19. UCF: 62. South Florida: 30. SMU: 66. Tulane: 54. Temple: 66. East Carolina: 62. UConn: 100

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Austin Peay: 21 by 54.5. Michigan: 17 by 40.6. Marshall: 6 by 34.4. UCF: 11 by 41.5. South Florida: 7 by 17.9. SMU: 18 by 35.5. Tulane: 10 by 43.3. Temple: 13 by 62.1. East Carolina: 15 by 43.1. UConn: 16 by 63.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins87.7 · Games = 3 · +33.8 vs Losses
Losses53.9 · Games = 7 · -33.8 vs Wins