Player Stats

Kavika Fonua College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
135
TFL
6
Sacks
1
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
6
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2016 PostseasonBYU112-0--010.3
2016 Regular SeasonBYU112210--010.3
2017 Regular SeasonBYU30-0--033.3
2018 Regular SeasonBYU00-0--0-
2019 PostseasonBYU13511-1051.7
2019 Regular SeasonBYU13782012051.7
2020 PostseasonBYU105-0--026.1
2020 Regular SeasonBYU102320-3226.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason

BYU paired 10 primary output with 34 efficiency.

Supporting note

2020 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 16.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2020 Postseason · BYU

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

16.7

Usage

3

Consistency

13.3

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCF: 0. Navy: 0. Troy: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0. UTSA: 2. Houston: 0. Texas State: 1. Boise State: 0. North Alabama: 0. San Diego State: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 5 by 20.8. Navy: 2 by 8.3. Troy: 2 by 18.3. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 12.5. UTSA: 3 by 32.5. Houston: 1 by 4.2. Texas State: 3 by 22.5. Boise State: 2 by 8.3. San Diego State: 7 by 39.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half0.6 · Games = 5 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs First Half