Usage Score
7.7
Player Dossier
2014-2015Temple
TE • 6'4" • Norristown, PA, USA
Kip Patton reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
7.7
Efficiency
58.2
Consistency
26.2
Season Value
43.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Temple
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kip Patton, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Temple. Kip Patton reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kip Patton played TE for Temple. Across 2 tracked seasons, Kip Patton recorded 41 rushing yards, 169 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Temple.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Temple paired 169 primary output with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
16.9
Efficiency
58.2
Usage
7.7
Consistency
26.2
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 3. Penn State: 29. Massachusetts: 48. Charlotte: 9. Tulane: 43. UCF: 1. East Carolina: 30. Memphis: 0. UConn: 4. Houston: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 1 by 20. Penn State: 2 by 96.7. Massachusetts: 3 by 100. Charlotte: 1 by 60. Tulane: 1 by 100. UCF: 1 by 6.7. East Carolina: 2 by 100. UConn: 1 by 26.7. Houston: 1 by 13.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Best efficiency game
100 vs East Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/23 | @ Toledo | L 17-32 | — | 1 | 3 | 2.5 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 12/5 | @ Houston | L 13-24 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs UConn | W 27-3 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Memphis | W 31-12 | — | — | — | 13 | — | — | — |
| Thu 10/22 | @ East Carolina | W 24-14 | — | 2 | 30 | 12.3 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs UCF | W 30-16 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Tulane | W 49-10 | — | 1 | 43 | 31 | 43 | 0 | 43 |
| Fri 10/2 | @ Charlotte | W 37-3 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Massachusetts | W 25-23 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Penn State | W 27-10 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 20 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Temple
2014-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Temple | 169 | 58.2 | 7.7 | 169 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Temple | 169 | 58.2 | 7.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48
Primary metric
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulane
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
30
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Penn State
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#5
Charlotte
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Temple
169 primary output · 58.2 efficiency · 7.7 usage
43.4
#2
2015 Regular Season · Temple
43.4
169 primary · 58.2 efficiency · 7.7 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Temple
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7919
Norristown Area · Norristown, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
169
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.