Player Stats

Darrell Langham College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
363
Receptions
24
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonMiami0-00-
2015 Regular SeasonMiami0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonMiami0-00-
2017 Regular SeasonMiami511209263.8
2018 Regular SeasonMiami813154360.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season

Miami paired 209 primary output with 82.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 62.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 87.5th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Miami

Games

8

Receiving Yards / G

19.3

Efficiency

62.9

Usage

14

Consistency

60

Best Game by takeover score

North Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. LSU: 14. Savannah St: 38. Toledo: 23. North Carolina: 33. Florida State: 9. Boston College: 30. Virginia Tech: 3. Pittsburgh: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 2 by 46.7. Savannah St: 1 by 100. Toledo: 2 by 76.7. North Carolina: 3 by 73.3. Florida State: 1 by 60. Boston College: 2 by 100. Virginia Tech: 1 by 20. Pittsburgh: 1 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins18.3 · Games = 6 · -3.7 vs Losses
Losses22 · Games = 2 · +3.7 vs Wins