Usage / Role
18%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2014-2018Tennessee
RB • 6'1" • 213 lbs • Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Madre London leans balanced backfield option traits and 33.5 efficiency.
Usage / Role
18%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
25
Developing production for a back
Reliability
25
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
50
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Michigan State
Snapshot
Player Story
Madre London built his college career from 2014 through 2018 as a running back from Fort Lauderdale, FL wearing No. 31, spending time with Michigan State and Tennessee. The clearest part of Madre London's career was...
Read the storyMadre London, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Michigan State. Madre London leans balanced backfield option traits and 33.5 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan State | 11 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 64.6 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 11 | 502 | 489 | 13 | 3 | 64.6 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 8 | 135 | 120 | 15 | 2 | 27.1 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan State | 12 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 48.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 12 | 349 | 287 | 62 | 4 | 48.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tennessee | 10 | 211 | 206 | 5 | 3 | 29.2 |
Related Context
Madre London played RB for Michigan State and Tennessee. Across 5 tracked seasons, Madre London recorded 1,130 rushing yards, 105 receiving yards, and 10 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Michigan State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Michigan State paired 523 primary output with 43.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 33.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Tennessee.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with 75 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
21.1
Efficiency
33.5
Usage
8
Consistency
20.3
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 12. East Tennessee State: 47. UTEP: 75. Florida: 66. Georgia: 6. Auburn: 0. Alabama: -5. Charlotte: 7. Kentucky: 3. Missouri: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 5 by 25. East Tennessee State: 8 by 61.2. UTEP: 10 by 81.3. Florida: 11 by 62.5. Georgia: 3 by 20.8. Auburn: 1 by 0. Alabama: 2 by 0. Charlotte: 3 by 19.1. Kentucky: 1 by 31.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
81.3 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/17 | vs Missouri | L 17-50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Kentucky | W 24-7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Charlotte | W 14-3 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2.3 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Alabama | L 21-58 | 2 | -5 | -2.50 | 0 | — | — | -2.5 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Auburn | W 30-24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Georgia | L 12-38 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Florida | L 21-47 | 11 | 66 | 6 | 1 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs UTEP | W 24-0 | 9 | 74 | 8.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.5 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs East Tennessee State2+ TD | W 59-3 | 8 | 47 | 5.90 | 2 | — | — | 5.9 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs West Virginia | L 14-40 | 5 | 12 | 2.40 | 0 | — | — | 2.4 |
Player Story
Madre London built his college career from 2014 through 2018 as a running back from Fort Lauderdale, FL wearing No. 31, spending time with Michigan State and Tennessee. The clearest part of Madre London's career was his backfield work: 1,130 rushing yards, 272 carries, 11 rushing touchdowns, and 105 receiving yards across 41 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2017 with Michigan State. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 105 receiving yards, 10 tackles, and 41 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 41 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Michigan State and Tennessee.
The arc is straightforward: Madre London moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2014-2017
Opening stop
Tennessee
2018
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Michigan State | 523 | 43.5 | 20.6 | 523 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 523 | 43.5 | 20.6 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 135 | 40.1 | 6.3 | -388 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan State | 366 | 34.5 | 12.6 | 231 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 366 | 34.5 | 12.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tennessee | 211 | 33.5 | 8 | -155 |
#1 Featured game
vs Oregon
Week 2 · W 31-28
Win with 103 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
103
Scrimmage Yards
84.9 takeover
103 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.
#2
vs Purdue
Week 5 · W 24-21 · Conference game
96
Scrimmage Yards
80.9 takeover
Win with 96 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
96 scrimmage yards and 32.1 usage.
#3
@ Minnesota
Week 7 · W 30-27 · Conference game
79
Scrimmage Yards
76.9 takeover
Win with 79 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
79 scrimmage yards and 28.8 usage.
#4
@ Michigan
Week 6 · W 14-10 · Conference game
78
Scrimmage Yards
76.6 takeover
Win with 78 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
78 scrimmage yards and 23.5 usage.
#5
vs UTEP
Week 3 · W 24-0
75
Scrimmage Yards
75.6 takeover
Win with 75 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
75 scrimmage yards and 15.9 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Michigan State
523 primary output · 43.5 efficiency · 20.6 usage
64.6
#2
2015 Regular Season · Michigan State
64.6
523 primary · 43.5 efficiency · 20.6 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Michigan State
48.5
366 primary · 34.5 efficiency · 12.6 usage
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.