Player Stats

Jake Hartbarger College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTDPrimaryOverall
2015 PostseasonMichigan State1400100
2015 Regular SeasonMichigan State1400100
2016 Regular SeasonMichigan State1200100
2017 PostseasonMichigan State1300100
2017 Regular SeasonMichigan State1300100
2018 Regular SeasonMichigan State200100
2019 PostseasonMichigan State1300100
2019 Regular SeasonMichigan State1300100

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Michigan State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2019 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with — efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest

Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2019 Postseason · Michigan State

Games

13

Primary Metric / G

0

Efficiency

Usage

Consistency

100

Best Game by takeover score

Wake Forest

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 0. Tulsa: 0. Western Michigan: 0. Arizona State: 0. Northwestern: 0. Indiana: 0. Ohio State: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Penn State: 0. Illinois: 0. Michigan: 0. Rutgers: 0. Maryland: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 7 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 6 · +0 vs Wins