Usage Score
0.9
Player Dossier
2014-2017Michigan State
CB • 6'0" • 198 lbs • Tampa, FL, USA
T.J. Harrell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
0.9
Efficiency
4.2
Consistency
100
Season Value
35
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
T.J. Harrell, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Michigan State. T.J. Harrell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Michigan State paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
4.2
Usage
0.9
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 0. Minnesota: 0. Maryland: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 1 by 4.2. Minnesota: 1 by 4.2. Maryland: 1 by 4.2
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Washington State
Best efficiency game
4.2 vs Washington State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0.5 | 7.7 | 2.5 | 0.5 |
| 2017 Postseason | Michigan State | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | -0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5
Primary metric
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 26.9 takeover score.
#2
Penn State
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#3
Illinois
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
0
Primary metric
Game with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#5
Washington State
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Michigan State
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35
#2
2017 Regular Season · Michigan State
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Michigan State
5.6
0.5 primary · 7.7 efficiency · 2.5 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8878
Choctaw · Choctaw, OK
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
11
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
T.J. Harrell quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit