Usage Score
8.6
Player Dossier
2014-2017UCLA
RB • 5'11" • 210 lbs • Las Vegas, NV, USA
Nate Starks leans balanced backfield option traits and 51.1 efficiency.
Usage Score
8.6
Efficiency
51.1
Consistency
19.4
Season Value
28.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · UCLA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nate Starks, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · UCLA. Nate Starks leans balanced backfield option traits and 51.1 efficiency.
Nate Starks played RB for UCLA. Across 4 tracked seasons, Nate Starks recorded 791 rushing yards, 204 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2015 with UCLA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
UCLA paired 369 primary output with 59.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 51.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Hawai'i
Win with 110 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Scrimmage Yards / G
40
Efficiency
51.1
Usage
8.6
Consistency
19.4
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 110. Memphis: 10. Colorado: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Hawai'i
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UCLA
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | UCLA | 197 | 41.8 | 5.3 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | UCLA | 197 | 41.8 | 5.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | UCLA | 369 | 59.2 | 9.8 | 172 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UCLA | 369 | 59.2 | 9.8 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UCLA | 309 | 30.8 | 21.2 | -60 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UCLA | 120 | 51.1 | 8.6 | -189 |
#1 Featured game
BYU
Win with 81 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
81
Primary metric
81 scrimmage yards and 15.2 usage.
#2
Hawai'i
110
Primary metric
Win with 110 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
110 scrimmage yards and 20 usage.
#3
California
74
Primary metric
Loss with 74 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
74 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.
#4
Arizona
56
Primary metric
Win with 56 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
56 scrimmage yards and 9.2 usage.
#5
Arizona
80
Primary metric
Win with 80 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
80 scrimmage yards and 32.7 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · UCLA
369 primary output · 59.2 efficiency · 9.8 usage
58.1
#2
2015 Regular Season · UCLA
58.1
369 primary · 59.2 efficiency · 9.8 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · UCLA
47
309 primary · 30.8 efficiency · 21.2 usage
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9243
Cherry Creek · Englewood, CO
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
995
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.