Usage Score
27.5
Player Dossier
2014-2017UCLA
Jordan Lasley
WR • 6'1" • 210 lbs • Compton, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jordan Lasley reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
97.9
Consistency
76.6
Season Value
75.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · UCLA
1415161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UCLA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: California
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Lasley, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · UCLA. Jordan Lasley reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
UCLA paired 1,264 primary output with 97.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 97.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · UCLA
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
140.4
Efficiency
97.9
Usage
27.5
Consistency
76.6
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 128. Texas A&M: 100. Memphis: 62. Stanford: 158. Colorado: 146. Arizona: 77. Arizona State: 162. USC: 204. California: 227
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 8 by 100. Texas A&M: 4 by 100. Memphis: 4 by 100. Stanford: 11 by 95.8. Colorado: 7 by 100. Arizona: 6 by 85.6. Arizona State: 7 by 100. USC: 10 by 100. California: 12 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins158.8 · n=4 · +33.0 vs Losses
Losses125.8 · n=5 · -33.0 vs Wins
First Half118.8 · n=5 · -48.7 vs Second Half
Second Half167.5 · n=4 · +48.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/27 | vs Kansas State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-35 | — | 8 | 128 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs California100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-27 | — | 12 | 227 | 16.5 | 18.90 | 1 | 41 |
| Sun 11/19 | @ USC100 receiving yards · High volume | L 23-28 | — | 10 | 204 | 18.8 | 20.40 | 3 | 43 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards | W 44-37 | — | 7 | 162 | 23.1 | 23.10 | 1 | 59 |
| Sun 10/15 | @ Arizona | L 30-47 | — | 6 | 77 | 10.7 | 12.80 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 10/1 | vs Colorado100 receiving yards | W 27-23 | — | 7 | 146 | 20.9 | 20.90 | 0 | 46 |
| Sun 9/24 | @ Stanford100 receiving yards · High volume | L 34-58 | — | 11 | 158 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Memphis | L 45-48 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 21 |
| Sun 9/3 | vs Texas A&M100 receiving yards | W 45-44 | — | 4 | 100 | 21 | 25 | 1 | 54 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UCLA
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | UCLA | 17 | 40 | 6.2 | 17 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UCLA | 620 | 79.5 | 17.5 | 603 |
| 2017 Postseason | UCLA | 1,264 | 97.9 | 27.5 | 644 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UCLA | 1,264 | 97.9 | 27.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
California
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
227
Primary metric
227 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
USC
204
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
204 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Utah
117
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
California
82
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon State
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · UCLA
1,264 primary output · 97.9 efficiency · 27.5 usage
75.5
#2
2017 Regular Season · UCLA
75.5
1,264 primary · 97.9 efficiency · 27.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · UCLA
54.7
620 primary · 79.5 efficiency · 17.5 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8867
Poplarville · Poplarville, MS
- Committed To
- Mississippi State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,901
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.